- What is an example of a credible source?
- What counts as a scholarly source?
- What is an example of an unreliable source?
- What is a unreliable source?
- Can you trust Wikipedia as a source?
- What are the 3 sources of information?
- Is .gov a scholarly source?
- What is the danger of using unreliable websites?
- What are some unreliable websites?
- How do you know if a source is credible?
- Is Google a credible source?
- Is Google Scholar credible?
- How do you tell if a source is scholarly or popular?
- Why is it important to use credible sources?
- How do you tell a credible source from a not so credible source?
- Is the Bible a scholarly source?
- Is YouTube a credible source?
- Why is the Internet an unreliable source?
What is an example of a credible source?
The most common credible sources are scholarly journals, conference papers and books because these have been peer-reviewed (read and approved for publication by other authors).
However, there are good websites that can be used; generally ending in .
gov / .
edu / ..
What counts as a scholarly source?
Scholarly sources are written by academics and other experts and contribute to knowledge in a particular field by sharing new research findings, theories, analyses, insights, news, or summaries of current knowledge. Scholarly sources can be either primary or secondary research.
What is an example of an unreliable source?
The following are unreliable sources because they require confirmation with a reliable source: Wikipedia: although this is a good starting point for finding initial ideas about a topic, some of their information and attached resources may not be reliable. Blogs, tweets. Personal websites.
What is a unreliable source?
Unreliable sources don’t always contain true, accurate, and up-to-date information. Using these sources in academic writing can result in discrediting writers’ status.
Can you trust Wikipedia as a source?
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. …
What are the 3 sources of information?
In general, there are three types of resources or sources of information: primary, secondary, and tertiary. It is important to understand these types and to know what type is appropriate for your coursework prior to searching for information.
Is .gov a scholarly source?
Government documents and government websites are generally considered authoritative, credible sources of information. Many are scholarly, and some are even peer-reviewed! But, not all gov docs are scholarly or peer-reviewed. Government agencies produce a wide range of publications, for different purposes.
What is the danger of using unreliable websites?
Unreliable websites will give you bad information You can be reading outdated information. It can be written by someone who doesn’t know about the topic.
What are some unreliable websites?
Websites that may circulate misleading and/or potentially unreliable information (examples: ConsciousLifeNews.com, CountdownToZeroTime.com) These websites sometimes use clickbait-y headlines and social media descriptions (examples: BipartisanReport.com, TheFreeThoughtProject.com)
How do you know if a source is credible?
Here are a few points to consider when evaluating sources for credibility:Be skeptical. … Examine the source’s and author’s credentials and affiliations. … Evaluate what sources are cited by the author. … Make sure the source is up-to-date. … Check the endorsements and reviews that the source received.More items…
Is Google a credible source?
Google is not an academic source, or indeed, a source at all. “Google” should never be cited as a source. … Google Scholar is a branch of the Google search engine that strives to locate only scholarly sources, and bases the relevancy of an article on how often it was cited and who it was published by.
Is Google Scholar credible?
Only credible, scholarly material is included in Google Scholar, according to the inclusion criteria: “content such as news or magazine articles, book reviews, and editorials is not appropriate for Google Scholar.” Technical reports, conference presentations, and journal articles are included, as are links to Google …
How do you tell if a source is scholarly or popular?
The term scholarly typically means that the source has been “peer-reviewed,” which is a lengthy editing and review process performed by scholars in the field to check for quality and validity. To determine if your source has been peer-reviewed, you can investigate the journal in which the article was published.
Why is it important to use credible sources?
It is important to use credible sources in an academic research paper because your audience will expect you to have backed up your assertions with credible evidence. … Using evidence that does not come from a credible source of information will not convince your reader that your claim is plausible or even correct.
How do you tell a credible source from a not so credible source?
gov. Websites: There is not much information available. If the purpose is not informative but may have other motives, like to persuade, the site may not be credible. The website is not regularly updated or the author is unreliable.
Is the Bible a scholarly source?
The Bible is not primarily scholarly because it is not considered a debatable theory in the way most academic texts are. It is not peer-reviewed and does not have a bibliography, as most academic texts do.
Is YouTube a credible source?
YouTube: YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website.
Why is the Internet an unreliable source?
#1 There is no quality assurance when it comes to information found on the Internet: Anyone can post anything. #2 In most cases, information found on the web has not been checked for accuracy. #3 Not all web sites are created equal. They differ in quality, purpose, and bias.